MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6976920537 · doi:10.60692/5czst-26382

1634. Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Associated Health Care Utilization in the Pivotal Phase 3 Trial RSV Vaccine Efficacy Study In Older Adults Immunized Against RSV Disease (RENOIR)

2023· article· en· W6976920537 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Innovation in Industries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespiratory tract infectionsPlaceboDiseaseRespiratory systemRespiratory illnessImmunizationSputumRespiratory diseaseClinical trialBronchiolitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)-related disease poses an economic burden due to a substantial amount of health care utilization (HCU). RENOIR is a phase 3 global, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study evaluating vaccine efficacy (VE) in adults ≥60 years of age during two RSV seasons in Northern and Southern Hemisphere countries (Argentina, Canada, Finland, Japan, Netherlands, South Africa, and USA) (NCT05035212). VE at the end of the first RSV surveillance season (EOS1) against ARI-RSV, Lower Respiratory Tract Illness (LRTI)-RSV with ≥2 symptoms (2+ LRTI-RSV), and LRTI-RSV with ≥3 symptoms (3+ LRTI-RSV) was 62.2% (44.4, 74.9), 65.1% (35.9, 82.0), and 88.9% (53.6, 98.7), respectively. Methods HCU data and concomitant corticosteroid or antibiotic use were collected during the RSV season for Acute Respiratory Illness (ARI) events (defined as more than 1 day of new or increased cough, nasal congestion/discharge, sore throat, wheezing, sputum production, or shortness of breath). A pre-planned analysis of HCU at EOS1 was performed to assess HCU among participants receiving RSVpreF vs. placebo. Results A higher proportion of RSV-associated HCU was associated with more severe symptoms (43.0%, 60.3%, and 75% for ARI-RSV, 2+ LRTI-RSV, and 3+ LRTI-RSV, respectively). Medically attended (MA) VE was similar to VE for all first-episode cases with MA ARI-RSV 65.1% (35.9, 82.0), MA 2+ LRTI-RSV 70.4% (33.0, 88.4), MA 3+ LRTI-RSV 84.6% (32.0, 98.3). Most RSV-associated HCU were outpatient visits, with more in the placebo arm. A higher proportion of placebo arm participants with RSV cases had an RSV-associated emergency room visit. For ARI-RSV, there were 3 hospitalizations in the placebo arm and none in the RSVpreF arm. The placebo arm had higher antibiotic (11.8 - 55.6% higher) or corticosteroid (2.8 – 44.4% higher) use compared to the RSVpreF arm for ARI- or LRTI-RSV events. Table 1 Vaccine Efficacy of RSVpreF Against First Episode of RSV Cases in the First RSV Season – Evaluable Efficacy Population Table 2 Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated With RSV Cases in the First RSV Season Table 3 Prespecified Category of Concomitant Medication Uses for RSV Cases in the First RSV Season Conclusion RSVpreF reduced overall HCU and antibiotic or corticosteroid treatment for RSV-associated illnesses. The highest VE among MA RSV-associated cases was for MA 3+ LRTI-RSV. These findings suggest that RSVpreF may reduce RSV-related healthcare needs in older adults, thus alleviating this burden on health systems. Disclosures Edward E. Walsh, MD, Icosavax: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Kumar Ilangovan, MD, MSPH, MMCi, Pfizer, Inc.: Employee|Pfizer, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Agnieszka Zareba, MD PhD, Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Qin Jiang, PhD, Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Gonzalo Pérez Marc, M.D., GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Expert Testimony|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Elliot N. DeHaan, MD, Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Michael Patton, B.Sc., Pfizer Inc.: Employee|Pfizer Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Yanqing Kan, MS, Pfizer: Pfizer's employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Daniel P. Eiras, MD, MPH, Pfizer, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Tarek Mikati, MD,MPH, Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Elena Kalinina, PhD, Pfizer: Pfizer employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds David Cooper, PhD, Pfizer, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Annaliesa S. Anderson, PhD, Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Kena A. Swanson, Ph.D., Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds William C. Gruber, MD, Pfizer, Inc.: Employee|Pfizer, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Alejandra C. Gurtman, M.D., Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Beate Schmoele-Thoma, MD, Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information SystemSame topicDigital Innovation in IndustriesFrench-language works237,207