MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977059135 · doi:10.60770/5h6r-mp92

Attitudes of disposability towards MMIWG on the highway of tears

2024· article· en· W6977059135 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMRU-Repo · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Deviance, and Social Control
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousGovernment (linguistics)Face (sociological concept)Relation (database)Poison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls has been a common topic in the media for the past few decades, and the Canadian government and Canadian people are beginning to recognize, realise and uncover the truths behind the continuing epidemic of Indigenous women identifying and LGBTQ2+ being victimised and murdered all over the country. As the cause is gaining attention, it is important to take the time to understand why thousands of Indigenous Women and Girls have gone missing or have been found murdered with little to no attention from police, society, or the media. This project connects the relationship between “disposability” and “MMIWG”, and then implements the relation onto the case study of the Highway of Tears, using CPTED to provide a concrete direction of application for future use. The research is found by using a semi-systematic literature review and case study approach using online journal tools and examining the contents for similar relationships and findings. A clear equation can be formulated to understand how MMIWG has grown exponentially with little knowledge to the greater public. Society finds certain behaviours as “risky”, and these behaviours come with predetermined consequences that are accepted as a punishment. Therefore, if Indigenous women partake in societally deemed “risky” behaviours, and if they face violence, it is deemed as an acceptable punishment, therefore when it is taken to the police there is less help provided due to the preconceived notions that the violence is the result of the “risky” behaviours, versus the Indigenous women being a target of violence. This project utilises a CPTED study on the Highway of Tears in order to create recommendations to make the space safer. The results found that there was a lack of defensible space, light and the environment inhibits communities to be key agents in their own safety, which speaks to the rates of MMIWG on the highway. Keywords: MMIWG, Highway of Tears, Disposability, CPTED.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMRU-RepoSame topicCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlFrench-language works237,207