MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977083537 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26651043

Additional file 6 of Prioritizing a research agenda on built environments and physical activity: a twin panel Delphi consensus process with researchers and knowledge users

2024· article· en· W6977083537 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNF-κB Signaling Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie UniversityResearch Institute for AgingUniversity of WaterlooParachuteUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of LethbridgeUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of SaskatchewanAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of TorontoCarleton UniversityUniversity of CalgaryOttawa Public HealthChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioStatistics CanadaInfrastructure CanadaBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser UniversityPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDelphi methodProcess (computing)Table (database)Ranking (information retrieval)Delphi

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 6: Table S5. Average ranking of top 20 list in round 3 among researchers reported in order provided to researchers in round 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.117
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.117
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8970.112

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicNF-κB Signaling PathwaysFrench-language works237,207