MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977083537 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26651043

Additional file 6 of Prioritizing a research agenda on built environments and physical activity: a twin panel Delphi consensus process with researchers and knowledge users

2024· article· en· W6977083537 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNF-κB Signaling Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie UniversityResearch Institute for AgingUniversity of WaterlooParachuteUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of LethbridgeUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of SaskatchewanAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of TorontoCarleton UniversityUniversity of CalgaryOttawa Public HealthChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioStatistics CanadaInfrastructure CanadaBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser UniversityPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDelphi methodProcess (computing)Table (database)Ranking (information retrieval)Delphi

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 6: Table S5. Average ranking of top 20 list in round 3 among researchers reported in order provided to researchers in round 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicNF-κB Signaling PathwaysFrench-language works237,207