MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Supplement 1. Richness response, ANPP, and climate data for all studies included in the meta-analysis.

2016· dataset· en· W6977354055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpreadsheets and End-User Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecies richnessBody size and species richnessBiodiversityWildlifeSpecies diversityType (biology)Plant community

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

File List encroach_div_data.txt (md5: f755284466bd9e2836b9171063d5b016) Description The encroach_div_data.txt file is a tab separate file. It contains the raw data used to calculate "community type" averages of richness response and ANPP. It also includes meta-data about each study included, such as the corresponding citations, study site location, study design, and yearly climate averages (precipitation and temperature). Column descriptions: 1. Community_Type = the name of the community type that the study was categorized as 2. Richness_Cit = the first author name and year for of each site richness data 3. ANPP_Cit = the first author name and year for of each site richness data 4. Location= the location where the study took place, usually a nearby city, wildlife refuge or research station 5. State/Province = U.S. state or Canadian province where the study took place 6. Encroaching_Species: species name of the predominate encroaching species in the study 7. Study_Design = the type of study design used to compare encroached and unencroaced richness ('WvG' denotes a binary comparison between encroached and unencroached treatments in the same year[s] with species richness expressed as the number of species per plot, 'Inven' denotes a binary comparison between encroached and unencroached treatments in the same year[s] with species richness expressed as the total number of species found in unencroached and encroached treatments, 'HC' denotes a binary comparison before and after encroachment occurred in the same plots with species richness expressed as the number of species per plot, 'REG' denotes a comparison of woody cover [%] to species richness in the same year[s] with species richness expressed as the number of species per plot) 8. Latitude = latitude of the study site (decimal degrees) 9. Longitude: longitude of the study site (decimal degrees) 10. MAP = mean annual precipitation at the study site (mm/yr)_ 11. MAT = mean annual temperature of the study site (°C) 12. Richness_Response: richness response (unitless) 13. ANPP_Unencroached = annual aboveground net primary productivity measured in unencroached plots (g/ 14. ANPP_Encroached = annual aboveground net primary productivity measured in encroached plots (g/m<sup>2</sup>) Missing values are represented as "---" Check-sum values are: Column 8 (Latitude): SUM = 1186.73; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 9 (Longitude): SUM = -31870.377; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 10 (MAP): SUM = 16652.360; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 11 (MAT): SUM = 324.211; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 12 (Richness_response): SUM = -19.494; 0 values missing (rows with data: 30) Column 13 (ANPP_Unencroaced): SUM = 4500.100; 13 values missing (rows with data: 17) Column 14 (ANPP_Encroached): SUM = 13248.200; 12 values missing (rows with data: 18)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.007
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.369
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.053 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it