MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977467785 · doi:10.7298/25df-7627

UNBROKEN THREADS: REDRESSING AND REARTICULATING HODINǪHSǪ:NIH WOMEN’S DESIGN WORK, 1850-1945

2024· article· en· W6977467785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeCommons (Cornell University) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNegotiationLegitimacySovereigntyColonialismInterpreterAllianceWork (physics)Circulation (fluid dynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation explores the integral role Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih (Haudenosaunee) (Iroquois) women had on the collection, documentation, framing, and circulation of their design work in the mid-nineteenth to early-twentieth century. The Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih are an alliance of six sovereign Nations located across the upper region of what is colonially known as New York state and the Canadian provinces of Quebec and Ontario. As a matrilineal society, Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih women oversee the social, political, and economic welfare of the Six Nations. They decide on matters of concern such as warfare, sanction land use, establish diplomatic relations with other nations, as well as facilitate access to and travel through their traditional territories. In this dissertation, I develop the concept of articulating refusal-assertion to interpret the social negotiations that occurred between Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih women and the anthropologists, missionaries, and educators whose collections they helped to co-produce at the turn of the twentieth century. I argue that the decision to serve as procurers, interlocutors, and interpreters was strategic; Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih women upheld and enacted their matriarchal roles and responsibilities while negotiating the research activities and commercial ventures carried out on their traditional territories. Drawing on extensive archival- and museum-based research, I found that Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih women directed the collection, documentation, and circulation of their material culture and knowledge despite the archival erasures that seek to obfuscate, silence, and erase their voices and stories. I begin by addressing how Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih women refuse to recognize the legitimacy of colonial nation-states, as well as assert their nationhood through the visual and material record. Next, I focus on three forms of domestic labor (dressmaking, lacemaking, and homemaking) whereby Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih women engaged in acts of refusal and assertion from 1850 to 1945. Each chapter illustrates how Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih women refuted the boundaries and labels placed upon them, their bodies, and their communities amidst ongoing colonialism and capitalist expansion. I also show how they asserted their nationhood through production of textiles, regalia, and clothing. My intention is to redress archival erasures that have removed Hodinǫhsǫ́:nih women’s names, voices, and stories from their design work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeCommons (Cornell University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207