Moltitudini. Un progetto urbano nell’area del porto di Napoli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This publication gathers the results of the educational experience carried out during the first semester of the 2024–25 academic year within the Architectural Design Studio 3B, an integrated course in Architectural and Urban Design and Economic Evaluation, part of the Bachelor’s Degree in Architectural Sciences at the Department of Architecture of the University of Naples “Federico II.” Through the study of three architectural typologies—the tower, the line, and the block—new ways of relating contemporary design to the city of Naples were explored. In particular, the port area, historically a crossroads of encounters and exchanges, was at the center of the reflection: a place where, throughout history, the dialectic between city and sea, between travel and permanence, has generated complex and ever-evolving urban and cultural forms. For this reason, students were asked to demolish some architecturally poor pre-existing buildings and to integrate a third building into the broader redevelopment proposal for Calata del Piliero. To achieve these design goals, students traversed very different times and places: the time of the Italian Renaissance, the places that define Naples’s variable urban unity, and the time of a fragmented present. The educational hypotheses, course structure, and project outcomes are retraced in this book to provide a record of the teaching experience, to offer a broader reflection on the relationship between teaching, research, and design, and—last but not least—to provide future students with a small map to help them navigate upcoming architectural design exercises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".