MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lipidomic Analysis of the Effect of Irradiation on the Flavor of Chilled Pigeon Meat

2023· article· en· W6977882545 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRadiation Effects and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlavorHexanalLinoleic acidNonanalOleic acidMass spectrometryLipid oxidation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to explore the characteristic flavor compounds and to infer the possible main flavor precursors in irradiated pigeon meat, the changes of volatile compounds and lipid metabolites in irradiated pigeon meat were analyzed by headspace solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole time-of-flight high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-Triple-TOF MS/MS). The results showed that hydrocarbon and aldehydes were the major volatile components in pigeon meat. There were 10 key flavor components identified, among which, nonanal, (E)-2-hexenal, decanal, hexanal, (E)-2-octenal, (E,E)-2,4-nonadienal, octanal, 2,4-decadienal, and 1-octen-3-ol substances were derived from lipid oxidation, and nonanal aldehydes such as aldehydes, decanal, and hexanal may be generated by the decomposition of oleic and linoleic acids. Fatty acids (FA), AcylCarnitine, plasmenylPE, GlcCer_NDS, AcyGlcADG, lysoPC, Cer_BS, and lysoPS were identified as significantly differential lipid subclasses. Among the 30 lipid molecules with variable importance in the projection (VIP) scores higher than two, 6 contained oleic acid (C18:1) and 10 contained linoleic acid (C18:2). Oleic acid and linoleic acid, precursors for the formation of the characteristic flavor substances of pigeon meat, may be generated by the degradation of these 16 lipid molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicRadiation Effects and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207