MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6977921710 · doi:10.71892/11143/923

Effets du topotécan, de la cytarabine, du carboplatin et du paclitaxel par infusion intra-artérielle dans le modèle pré-clinique F98-Fischer

2025· other· fr· W6977921710 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUSherbrooke-PROD · 2025
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarboplatinCytarabineGlioblastomaPaclitaxelChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) represent the most aggressive primary malignant cerebral tumor. The first line of treatment is well established with a maximal surgical resection followed by concomitant radio- and chemotherapy. However, the effects of this treatment remain modest with a median survival of 14.6 months (Stupp et al. 2005). Second line of treatment has not yet been established and varies from treatment center to another. At the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Sherbrooke, our team prioritizes the administration of chemotherapy agents by intra-arterial (IA) infusion (Fortin et al. 2019). This project has two distinct objectives: (1) to evaluate the maximum dose that can be administered without adverse effects using IA administration of four chemotherapeutic agents (topotecan, cytarabine and new formulations of carboplatin and paclitaxel); and (2) to determine their therapeutic efficacy using this route of administration compared with the conventional intravenous (IV) route. Healthy animals (without brain tumours) were used for part (1), while a syngeneic F98-Fischer model with a glial tumour was chosen for part (2). Only three agents were tested in arm (1), topotecan, cytarabine and paclitaxel, as carboplatin is already used clinically by this route with a known maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of 20 mg/kg (Charest et al., 2013; Côté et al., 2013). The MTDs (1) of topotecan and cytarabine were assessed at 4 mg/kg and 8.75 mg/kg, respectively. However, IA infusion of paclitaxel proved impossible due to its neurotoxicity. Encouraging results were demonstrated in terms of the therapeutic efficacy (2) of topotecan in the IA setting, with a significant increase in the survival rate in the IA group (29 days) compared with the IV group (23.5 days). For cytarabine, the results suggest a toxic trend, with survival in the IA group being lower than in the IV group (22.5 vs. 26.5 days). The new formulation of carboplatin proved significantly more effective than those commercially available, with median survival of 37.5 days versus 26 and 30 days, respectively (Charest et al., 2013; Côté et al., 2013). Finally, since paclitaxel cannot be administered IA, intratumoral infusion was tested. This proved ineffective with a non-significant median survival in the SHAM group compared to the treated group with respective survivals of 28.5 and 29 days. In conclusion, an increase in the therapeutic efficacy of topotecan and the new carboplatin formulation has been demonstrated, whereas cytarabine and paclitaxel have reported neurotoxicity with this route of administration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSherbrooke-PRODSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207