Shifted Composition IV: Toward Ballistic Acceleration for Log-Concave Sampling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantifying the convergence rate of the underdamped Langevin dynamics (ULD) is a classical topic, in large part due to the possibility for diffusive-to-ballistic speedups -- as was recently established for the continuous-time dynamics via space-time Poincare inequalities. A central challenge for analyzing ULD is that its degeneracy necessitates the development of new analysis approaches, e.g., the theory of hypocoercivity. In this paper, we give a new coupling-based framework for analyzing ULD and its numerical discretizations. First, in the continuous-time setting, we use this framework to establish new parabolic Harnack inequalities for ULD. These are the first Harnack inequalities that decay to zero in contractive settings, thereby reflecting the convergence properties of ULD in addition to just its regularity properties. Second, we build upon these Harnack inequalities to develop a local error framework for analyzing discretizations of ULD in KL divergence. This extends our framework in part III from uniformly elliptic diffusions to degenerate diffusions, and shares its virtues: the framework is user-friendly, applies to sophisticated discretization schemes, and does not require contractivity. Applying this framework to the randomized midpoint discretization of ULD establishes (i) the first ballistic acceleration result for log-concave sampling (i.e., sublinear dependence on the condition number), and (ii) the first $d^{1/3}$ iteration complexity guarantee for sampling to constant total variation error in dimension $d$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".