MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6979778784

The AgBiotech Bulletin, Volume 1, Issue 3, May/June 1993

2010· article· en· W6979778784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioactive natural compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommercializationAgricultureDelegationPer capitaCanolaFederal budgetProfessional association
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AgBiotech Bulletin, Volume 1, Issue 3, May/June 1993 Published by AG-WEST BIOTECH INC. Code: NL93008 Size of Files: Text: 40K Graphics: No associated graphics files Contents Farm Survey Shows Ag-Biotech Support A new survey of over 550 farmers commissioned by Ag-West Biotech Inc. indicates that producers in the three prairie provinces feel there are strong potential benefits generated by agbiotech. Regulatory Review Update Agriculture Canada is doing an extensive review of all of its regulations some of which will have some impact on biotech. Continued consultation with Ottawa officials will ensure appropriate regulations for agbiotech. 1993 Federal Budget Highlights On April 26, 1993, the Hon. Don Mazankowski, Minister of Finance, delivered his government's 1993 budget which contains several income tax items of interest to the biotech community. * Patents and Licences * R & D Benefits * Elimination of Annual Limit for Claiming Investment Tax Credits * Non-resident Withholding Taxes Synthetic Seeds of Forest Trees Dr. Steve Attree, a Professional Research Associate in Professor Larry Fowke's laboratory in the Biology Department, University of Saskatchewan, is developing new methods for propagating Canadian forest trees (conifers) using tissue culture. Dr. Attree is using a technique known as somatic embryogenesis. Improved ROI for R & D The American Small Business Administration recently published a report demonstrating that the rate of return on R & D investments is superior for small companies. Biotech Paper from CFA The Canadian Federation of Agriculture presented a fact paper on agricultural biotechnology at its annual meeting. * Social Impacts Network Notes Institute for Science in Society Calgene - Field Testing of Genetically Engineered Canola ABC Conference - Raleigh, North Carolina Limagrain Chang Chun Delegation Commercialization in a Developing Economy Pioneer Hi-Bred A-STEP Hoechst Documentary Released Biostar Inc. Monsanto National Research Council People Watch CIBA Seeds Plant Biotechnology Institute (PBI) MicroBio RhizoGen (MBR) Agriculture Canada Saskatchewan Research Council Plant Biotechnology Institute (PBI) Entrepreneur Recognized Expert Committee on Weeds Weed Science Society of America Canadian Exporters' Association Canadian Research Management Association Legal News Plant Breeders' Rights Act Amended On March 4, 1991, Canada became a party to the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) as revised in 1978. The Plant Breeders' Rights Act came into effect in Canada on November 6, 1991 following the publication of Regulations for canola, chrysanthemums, potatoes, roses, soybeans and wheat. Amendments to Biotech Regulations at USDA's APHIS A final rule is now in effect amending USDA's biotech regulations. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has added notification and petition processes, as options in the existing framework for the introduction of certain genetically engineered plants. Biotechnology Awareness

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3280.313

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicBioactive natural compoundsFrench-language works237,207