MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6979860804

Análise de dados digitais multiespectrais de alta resolução obtidos pelo sensor “Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager” em área rural do estado do Paraná - Brasil

2015· article· en· W6979860804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic mapMultispectral imageSpectral bandsReflectivityStereoscopyMultispectral pattern recognitionHyperspectral imaging
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to analyse, using digital and visual approaches, the data from 7 multispectral bands provided by the Canadian sensor "Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager". The spectral configuration was from one tested in Canada and the spectral ranges of each of the bands were the following: band 1 (455.0 - 481.4 hm), band 2 (448.4 - 555.5 hm), band 3 (678.4 - 682.0 hm), band 4 (710.7 - 714.3 hm), band 5 (736.0 - 739.6 hm), band 6 (746.9 - 750.5 hm), band 7 (785.0 - 788.6 hm). The study area is located in the Experimental Research Farm from the Federal University of Paraná, located in Pinhais County, 18 km north of Curitiba. A thematic map of the area was elaborated through visual interpretation of stereoscopic aerial photographs 1:8.000, B&W, 23 x 23 cm and 1:2.500 enlarged normal color prints and also detailed fieldwork. The methodology of the research had the following aspects: enhancement techniques; visual interpretation of the individual enhanced bands; defining the possible colour composition using the seven bands and selecting the best color composite; visual comparisons between individual bands and the best color composite. It was concluded that the bands 4 and 5 provided the best results; the best color composite (RGB) was resulted from the bands R3, G6, B7; the genus Araucaria, Eucalyptus e Pinus were mapped due to their low reflectance values and the visual interpretation of the bands comfirmed the correlation values found in the correlation matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicRemote Sensing in Agriculture→French-language works237,207→