Arctic Coastal Dynamics : Report of the 4th International Workshop, VNIIOkeangeologia, St. Petersburg (Russia), 10 - 13 November 2003
Bibliographic record
Abstract
and the International Permafrost Association (IPA) and a regional project of IGBP-LOICZ (International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme -Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone).Its overall objective is to improve our understanding of circum-Arctic coastal dynamics as a function of environmental forcing, coastal geology and cryology and morphodynamic behavior.The fourth IASC-sponsored ACD workshop was held in St. Petersburg, Russia, on November 10-13, 2003.Participants from Canada (7), Germany (7), Great Britain (2), the Netherlands (1), Norway (1), Russia (32), Ukraine (1) and the United States (8) attended.During the first part of the workshop, 63 Papers dealing with regional andlor circum-Arctic coastal dynamics were presented.Based On the material presented, five thematic working groups were identified: (1) GIS working group to develop of a circum-Arctic coastal GIS system, (2) coastal permafrost working group to discuss processes involved in the transition of onshore to offshore permafrost, (3) biogeochemistry working group with the focus On transport and fate of eroded material (4) biodiversity working group to initiate planning of an Arctic Coastal Biodiversity research agenda, ( 5 ) environmental data working group to discuss coastal dynamics as a function of environmental forcing.Finally, the results of the workshop and the next steps were discussed in the ACD Steering Committee meeting.The present report summarizes the program of the workshop and the main results.l Introduction establish the rates and magnitudes of erosion and accumulation of Arctic coasts and to estimate the amount of sediments and organic carbon derived from coastal erosion;The project elements for Arctic Coastal Dynarnics (ACD) were formulated at a workshop in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, in November 1999 funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and organized under the auspices of the International Permafrost Association (IPA), through its working group On
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".