MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980036626

Arctic-Alaska rotation hypothesis revisited

2001· article· en· W6980036626 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital collections (Goethe University Frankfurt) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevonianTerraneLaurentiaPaleozoicMassifArcticPlate tectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kurzfassung Unterschiede im prä -mississippischen Gestein jenseits der Grenze zwischen Alaska und Kanada können erklärt werden , wenn die arktische Zone von Alaska in die Nähe von Ellesmere Island und Grönland zur Zeit des Altpaläozoikums gerückt wird .Vom Obersilur bis zum Unterdevon kann dieses Gebiet eines von vielen gewesen sein , das an den nördlichsten Teil von Ellesmere Island andockte .Vom Spätdevon bis zur frühmississippischen Epoche könnte es sich um 1500 km oder mehr entlang der Polarzone des Laurentischen Massivs verschoben haben , als Sibirien mit dem heutigen nordöstlichen Nordamerika zusammenstieß .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital collections (Goethe University Frankfurt)Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207