Bibliographic record
Abstract
"As Bad as All That!"I believe my eyes!About years ago, I was able to obtain a report showing the proportion of Muslims in Central Government Services.It was just about two percent.I was shocked, disgusted, furious.For more than a quarter of a century the Muslims of India had been told that they should strengthen the hands of Pandit Nehru and, after him, of his daughter, to save India's Muslims from Hindu communalists.And this is just what the Muslims of India did-strengthen the hands of the Congress and particularly of Nehru and then his daughter.And what have the Muslims received in return?Their representation in Central Government Services has been reduced to roughly one-sixth of what it should be.If this is secularism, then secularism is nothing but a farce and a fraud, a word coined (or borrowed) to make fools of the Muslims of India.Even if India had been ruled by Hindu communalists for the past quarter of a century how could things have been worse?Perhaps there would have been zero percent Muslims in the Central Government Service.Well, what is the difference between zero and a measly two percent?Is the loudly trumpeted "secularism" of the Nehru-Gandhis only worth this much?I wrote all this.More than Urdu newspapers carried my articles prominently.Many commented editorially, endorsing and acclaiming my views.I belong to a family of ardent Congressmen.My elders staunchly opposed communalism, fanaticism, partition, etc., and valiantly fought for freedom.My eldest uncle, Tasadduq Ahmad Khan Shervani, was a close friend, colleague and comrade of Jawahar Lal Nehru.He was in and out of jails with him.My second uncle, Nisar Ahmad Shervani, was one of the very first Indians to resign from British service and join the national movement.My father, Fida Ahmad Shervani, was one of the first students to leave the university on Mahatma Gandhi's call.The Shervani Brothers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".