MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6980115910

Autosomal Recessive Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Type 10 (LGMD,10), Caused by a Novel Homozygous Variant in the TTN Gene

2025· article· en· W6980115910 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicHistory and advancements in chemistry
Canadian institutionsCanadian Paediatric Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMuscular dystrophyAutosomal recessive inheritanceGenetic counselingDiseaseGeneWeaknessMyopathy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Omar Ahmed Alghamdi,1 Osama Obaid,2 Ahmed Gamal Sayed,3 Hania Farhan,3 Jamal Sayed1 1Department of Pediatrics, Security Forces Hospital Makkah, (SFHM), Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Pediatrics, Maternity and Children Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 3College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, 11533, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Omar Ahmed Alghamdi, Email oaalghamdi@sfhm.med.saAbstract: Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy was first introduced in the 1950s as a distinct family of unusual genetic diseases. The prevalence of the disease is about 4– 7/1000, with a spectrum of onset at different ages. LGMD has a cluster of symptoms varying in severity and presentation in patients. Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy`s inheritance is unique as it can be autosomal dominant or recessive. We report a young boy with autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD), presented with distal muscle weakness in all four limbs for three years and thinning of legs, arms, and thighs. Our gene of focus is TTN, which is associated with muscle elasticity and myogenesis. Our subtype reported is currently associated with a new homozygous TTN variant; thus, we are writing a novel variant mutation causing limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 10.Keywords: LGMD, muscular dystrophies, TTN gene, titinopathy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicHistory and advancements in chemistry→French-language works237,207→