The Behavioural Profile Of Pongo Pygmaeus Morio In Kutai National Park: Positional Behaviour In A Precarious Habitat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the positional behaviour of female Pongo pygmaeus morio individuals in Kutai National Park, East Kalimantan, Indonesia during the 2015-2016 El Niño cycle. Several positional behaviour studies have been conducted on the Sumatran orangutan (P. abelii), yet only one had been conducted on P. p morio; this study was conducted by Cant in 1982, during a similarly strong El Niño cycle, and also only sampled female individuals (1987a). As such, this study provided an opportunity to verify the behavioural profile of P. p. morio as found by Cant during a similar environmental year, as well as verify the interspecific comparisons drawn from his sole study 35 years ago. This study verified some of the previous interspecific findings – mainly that P. p. morio employs an elevated use of ‘ipsilateral suspend’. However, some divergences from previous findings were found – mainly that ‘brachiation and forelimb swing’ and ‘sway’ occurred at higher frequencies than previously found in P. p. morio. Lower levels of ‘vertical climb’ and ‘descent’ were also found in P. p. morio here than found in the previous P. p. morio study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".