Braddock Bay Raptor Research Hawk Banding Summary Spring 1994
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A hawk banding project was conducted by Braddock Bay Raptor Research for the eleventh consecutive spring migration.The season was highlighted by season record high for three species and the number of foreign retraps and returns.A total of 1347 hawks of nine species were captured, banded and released this spring at Braddock Bay.This number of captures represents the second highest total only behind last year's season high of 1485.There was coverage on 88 of the 101 days between the period 19 February to 31 May.Coverage was not extended on days with inclement weather.There was a combined total of 1406.75 hours logged in the five blinds.There were record high totals of Northern Goshawk (32), Red-tailed Hawk (146), and Broadwinged Hawk (9).Four other species--Northern Harrier (57), Sharp-shinned Hawk (762), Cooper's Hawk (251), and Red-shouldered Hawk (14)were all near record highs.However, a real high point this year was the record high of 27 previously banded hawks (not banded by BBRR banders or, if so, not in the past 90 days) that were captured this spring: Sharp-shinned Hawk -18; Cooper's Hawk -5; Red-tailed Hawk -4.Most of these recaptures were from the north shore of Lake Ontario and Erie and captured during the fall migration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.072 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".