Cataloguing of Aníbal González’s residential work in Andalusia, Spain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this research, as part of the AGORA project, \n\t\t\t\t is to catalogue the residential work of one of the most repre-\n\t\t\t\t sentative architects of the Andalusian regionalist movement \n\t\t\t\t of the first quarter of the twentieth century, Aníbal González. \n\t\t\t\t The cataloguing system developed allows the classification \n\t\t\t\t of all the scattered information, which involves more than \n\t\t\t\t one hundred and sixty projects lacking enhancement and \n\t\t\t\t protection. The database designed comprises a set of records \n\t\t\t\t that collects all formal, stylistic, constructive, historical \n\t\t\t\t and documentary information of the buildings under study \n\t\t\t\t throughout their life cycle, collected from different sources \n\t\t\t\t that are not accessible to the general public. The accessi-\n\t\t\t\t bility of the research results will provide experts with the \n\t\t\t\t scientific knowledge needed for decision-making processes \n\t\t\t\t focused on heritage study and intervention. Furthermore, it \n\t\t\t\t will contribute to arouse interest in this significant heritage \n\t\t\t\t at the tourist level, innovating and diversifying the Andalu-\n\t\t\t\t sian cultural tourist offer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".