MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6980669273

Cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatry manifestation following mild and moderate traumatic brain injury at 3 month and 6 months

2020· dissertation· en· W6980669273 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropsychiatryTraumatic brain injuryCognitive impairmentMultivariate analysisPoison controlRisk factorMontreal Cognitive AssessmentYoung adult
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objective \nCognitive impairment (CI) and neuropsychiatry manifestation (NM) are known \ncomplications among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the clinical \ncorrelation of mild and moderate TBI with CI and NM have not been extensively studied \nin Malaysia. Our objectives were to determine i) the prevalence of CI and NM in mild \nand moderate TBI, ii) association between mild and moderate TBI with CI and NM and \niii) association between risk factors with CI and NM. \nMethods \nPatients (n=54) were divided into mild and moderate TBI. Both mild (n=26) and moderate \n(n=28) TBI were assessed at 3 months and 6 months post trauma for the same measures. \nDiagnosis of CI was made by using The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) while \nNM screening was done using General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) followed by \nMINI International Neuropsychiatry Interview (MINI) for diagnostic purpose. Univariate \nanalyses were done using chi square tests and multivariate analysis with multiple logistic \nregression test. \nResults \nWe found 5 patients (19.2%) with mild TBI had CI and 5 patients (19.2%) had NM at 3 \nmonths. Only 1 patient (3.8%) persistently has CI at 6 months while the rest recovered. \nAs for moderate TBI, 11 patients (39.3%) had CI and 7 patients (25%) had NM at 3 \nmonths but none had persistent CI or NM at 6 months. Age Umur (p<0.05, OR 0.678, CI \n0.463 – 0.995) and blood pressure were significant risks ((p< 0.05, OR 1.223, CI: 1.001 \n– 1.495) for CI and NM at 3 months. \nConclusion \nThis study highlighted the importance of screening for both CI and NM following mild \nand moderate TBI at 3 months and 6 months. These data are essential to help treating \nclinicians identifying potential risk factors among post head trauma patients. Therefore, \nearly recognition facilitates effective rehabilitation programs planning hence improve \nprognosis in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→