Comportamiento de las plántulas de rosas (Rosa sp.). Injertadas en las diferentes fases de la luna: Pedro Moncayo - Ecuador 2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research was developed in the Rancho San Jorge farm, located in Santa Clara neighborhood, Tupigachi parish, Canton Pedro Moncayo. It was evaluate the behavior of the rose baby plants (Rosa sp.) grafted at different phases of the moon. \nIt was used as rootstocks, the rose known as Natal Briar and the commercial variety Cherry-O! ® was grafted . \nFour were the treatments evaluated: T1 (grafts in First Quarter), T2 (grafts in Full Moon), T3 (grafts in Third Quarter) and T4 (grafts in new moon). The experimental design was a DCA (completely randomized design) forty plants were determined as experimental unit and three repetitions for each moon phase were established. \nThe variables evaluated were: percentage of seizure, days to harvest, stem length, stem diameter, length button, button diameter and exportable stems. An economic analysis to treatment was also performed. \nGrafts in First Quarter (T1) and full moon (T2) were the best treatments for vegetative appearance of the plant, grafts in new moon (T4) and Third Quarter (T3) had a lower growth cycle evaluated through the variable days to harvest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".