CON(TRA)CEPTS OF CARE: SOUTHERN ALBERTA BIRTH CONTROL CENTRES & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 1969-1979
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1969, as the government of Alberta rolled out their provincial healthcare policy the Canadian government decriminalized contraception and abortions approved by Therapeutic Abortion Committees. The unfortunate timing of both major legislative events meant that provincial birth control, abortion, and other reproductive and sexual health services remained in bureaucratic limbo for almost a decade until officially integrated into Alberta Healthcare Services between 1978 and 1979. Following decriminalization, activists and some medical professionals in southern Alberta established birth control centres using alternative reproductive health models and education plans to fill the voids in the new healthcare bureaucracy. These birth control centres, the Calgary Birth Control Association (CBCA) and the Lethbridge Birth Control and Information Centre (LBCIC), became hubs of reproductive and sexual health services, education, and expertise in 1970s Alberta, bringing an activist agenda to health services in this arena. \nThis study considers how activists like the women who established, ran, and visited the birth control centres, in southern Alberta spearheaded changes in reproductive health services that combined elements of feminism with principles of Medicare. By applying a reproductive justice framework, this dissertation examines the disparities in access to health and educational services based on race, age, and place and explores the activist legacies in so-called conservative regions. \nBuilding on foundational scholarship on the history of birth control, reproductive rights, reproductive justice, and women’s health activism, this dissertation argues that between 1969 and 1979 women’s activism within and related to these local birth control centres significantly shaped local and regional discourses of health, reproduction, and feminist politics. In doing so, I recognized the groundwork set by the activists at the LBCIC and CBCA created space for Alberta to become an unexpected leader in providing reproductive healthcare services in 1970s western Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".