Cotidianidad del personal de tropa acuartelado de la 32º brigada de infantería de Trujillo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT 3 Tesista Bachiller en Enfermería de la facultad de enfermería de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo. 4 Doctora en ciencias de enfermería. Docente principal de la facultad de enfermería; Sección de postgrado en enfermería de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo. Introduction: Nursing care for military brigades is little explored by our profession, this being a group of paramount importance in society and with certain peculiarities, which must be investigated due to the search for integral health in all spaces and Social subjects. Objective: to describe and analyze the daily routine of troop quarter staff of the 32nd Infantry Brigade of Trujillo. Theorists: Lefebvre and Heller for the daily and concepts of the quartered troop. Methodology: Qualitative, descriptive research. Scenario: 32 infantry brigade, north military region; Participants: eight young people from the barracks staff, selected with technique for convenience and saturation. Collection of speeches with in-depth interview and analysis with thematic analysis. Results: two categories and subcategories: Category 1. symbolism of being troop personnel; Subcategories: 1.1 love and defense of the Homeland and 1.2 organic and of mutual support. Category 2. 2. preparing for life in military time and space; Subcategories 2.1. Technical or professional training by the Armed Forces scholarship; 2.2.formation of values, discipline and Integrity. Final considerations: the participants have as symbolisms a feeling of love, service to the country, with an active and sacrificed daily dynamic that implies slight and radical changes in their lives in some cases. Express satisfaction for access to technical or vocational training and at the same time for training in values such as discipline and integrity; Although this routine is difficult for them, they express that the army has changed their lives, making them useful and necessary citizens for society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".