Cultures of Indigenous Diplomacy – A Digital Conference. Presentations Playlist
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Conference showcases reflections on themes linked to Dr Pedri-Spade’s work Material Kwe. The aim is to create space for interdisciplinary dialogue on intercultural expressions of diplomacy, through art and making, material culture including wampum, language and narration in Council speech, food, gender, and languages of law and sovereignty.Presentations include:Alex Jacobs-Blum, Lower Cayuga Nation of Six Nations of the Grand River Territory and German, “Finding my way back through visual storytelling”Rick Powless, Six Nations, Red Seal Chef: "yakunhéhkwʌ: Our Sisters", a cooking demonstration of Haudenosaunee traditional foodsSusan Hill, Associate Professor, University of Toronto: “Haudenosaunee Women and Diplomacy”Great Lakes Research Alliance (Heidi Bohaker, Alan Corbiere, Autumn Epple, Bradley Clements): “Great Lakes Diplomacy through Cultural Heritage”Damien Lee, Anishinaabe from Fort William FN, Canada Research Chair in Biskaabiiyang and Indigenous Political Resurgence: “Asunjigun and Anishinaabe Political Theory”Ken Parker, Seneca Nation, Indigenous horticulturalist and landscape professional: "Food Sovereignty and the Power of Indigenous Planting"Naomi Recollet, Anishinaabe-kwe (Odawa/Ojibwe), Crane Clan from the Wiikwemkoong Unceded TerritoryDale Turner, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of TorontoCeleste Pedri-Spade, Associate Professor and Queen’s National Scholar in Indigenous Studies, Queen’s University
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it