MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6980934652

A data analysis of Near Eastern Middle Palaeolithic hominid fossil occurrences using evidence of disposal of the dead

2001· other· en· W6980934652 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssemblage (archaeology)Statistical analysisPeriod (music)Absolute datingPaleozoicTaphonomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fossil occurrences ascribed to archaic Homo sapiens, Homo (sapiens) neandertalensis, or early Homo sapiens sapiens or associated with the Middle Palaeolithic or Mousterian Techno-complex from twenty caves and rockshelters in the Near East are examined. These sites include: A mud, Bisitun, Dederiyeh 2, Geulah, possibly el-Wad, Hayonim, Karain, Kebara, Ksar' Akil, Masloukh, Qafzeh, Ras el-Keib, Shanidar, Shovakh, Shukbah, Skhul, Tabun, Tamtama, Zuttiyeh, and Kanal, Tikali, or Merdevenli (near Magracik in Turkey). The patterns of behavior expressed at these sites through disposal of the dead evidence suggest regional continuity with the gradual emergence of social complexity during the Middle Palaeolithic and reflect symbolic prescience on the part of the social groups. Curation or post-mortem processing of skeletal remains intensified over time and continued into the Upper Palaeolithic. The Near Eastern Middle Palaeolithic was a period of social development which laid the foundations for Upper Palaeolithic behaviors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0090.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicHistorical Economic and Social Studies→French-language works237,207→