MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981013760

Destinations of Key Stage 4 and Key Stage 5 pupils, 2010/11

2013· other· en· W6981013760 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Education Resource Archive (University College London) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of SurreyDurham UniversityUniversity of BristolCardiff UniversityUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of LeedsNewcastle UniversityUniversity of ReadingUniversity of BathUniversity of WarwickUniversity of OxfordUniversity of DundeeImperial College LondonQueen's University BelfastUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of St AndrewsUniversity of SussexUniversity College LondonUniversity of SouthamptonUniversity of BirminghamUniversity of LeicesterUniversity of ExeterUniversity of NottinghamQueen's UniversityUniversity of East AngliaLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceKing's College London
KeywordsDestinationsKey (lock)Quality (philosophy)Stage (stratigraphy)Compulsory educationStatistics education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These are experimental statistics. The Key Stage 4 Measure is based on activity at academic age 16 (i.e.the year after the young person finished compulsory schooling) The Key Stage 5 Measure is based on activity in the year after the young person took their A Level or other level 3 qualification/sTo be included in the Measure, young people have to show sustained participation in an education or employment destination in all of the first two terms of the year after they completed KS4 or took A level or other level 3 qualifications.The first two terms is defined as October to March.The statistics are published as "Experimental Statistics" and do not display the National Statistics Logo.They are still being evaluated and remain subject to further testing to determine their reliability and ability to meet customer needs.The figures should be treated with caution as this is the first year for which employment, young people NEET and deferred HE offer data have been produced.As improvements are made to the methodology, data quality will be assessed to establish whether the statistics meet the quality standards for National Statistics. DESTINATIONS IN THE YEAR AFTERTAKING KEY STAGE 4, 2010/11, National (Table: KS4 National) 89% of young people were recorded as being in a sustained education or employment/training destination in the year after Key Stage 4. Education 86% of young people were recorded as being in a sustained education destination o School Sixth Form (37% of young people) and Further Education College (33%) were the most popular destinations o 12% of young people were studying in a Sixth Form College

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Education Resource Archive (University College London)Same topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207