Drawing from experience: exploring identity with individuals \nhealing from brain injury
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acquired brain injury often leaves an individual with long-term physical, cognitive and emotional impairments which can greatly impact their sense of self and relationships with others. Much of rehabilitation literature is focused on what is needed for the individual to return to a pre-injury ‘normal’, however that notion is rooted in a medical model of disability which puts most of the responsibility of recovery on the individual. This compounds the burden the patient and their caregivers have to carry. This study seeks to investigate the journey of recovery through a social model of disability to understand what a healing and supportive environment might look like to meet an individual where they are. Ten participants across Ontario living with brain injury were recruited from brain injury support groups and word of mouth. Qualitative art-based methods were used to deeper investigate the phenomenology of brain injury and its relationship with identity.Individual interviews and drawings produced rich data on the complex and diverse lived experience, building on previous arts-based studies with brain injury survivors. \n \nStudy findings offer further exploration into the lived experience of people living with brain injury through the challenges to their sense of self and coping mechanisms and solutions. Discussion centres around what shifts are needed in society to accommodate people with brain injury. Findings can also inform approaches for healthcare professionals and service providers. The research design intends to make a contribution to arts-based and participatory approaches in the current COVID-19 context, and to inform future researchers who intend to conduct research with remote participants who may often be excluded from in-person studies. Future work involves presenting the findings to family, friends, caregivers and professionals who work with brain injury through an arts-based knowledge transfer piece.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it