“The Earth as a Sandwich: The Collapse of Geography in Douglas Coupland’s Global Imagination”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an imaginary near future in which bees are extinct, one of the main characters of Coupland’s novel Generation A is astonishingly stung by one while she is creating an ‘Earth Sandwich’, an interconnected performance patently inspired by a real challenge issued to viewers by the online artist and vlogger Ze Frank in 2006. An ‘Earth Sandwich’ is created when two people simultaneously place two slices of bread on exactly opposite sides of the planet using GPS coordinates, so that, as the woman explains: “you make the sandwich, you post it, and maybe someone somewhere will see it, and once they’ve seen it, you’ve created art” (Coupland, 2009: 9). \nApart from the viral and transnational character of any form of creativity on the internet, favoured by a vertiginous acceleration of culture, what the novel mostly brings to the fore, by colliding the stories and figures of five characters stung by a bee in disparate parts of the globe (North America, Canada, New Zealand, France, and Sri Lanka), is in fact the recognition of a growing ‘shrinking’ (Harvey, 1990) or rather ‘flattening’ (Friedman, 2005) of the world – as if it were a sandwich indeed – as exchange of information becomes more readily and globally available through technology. Yet, as this paper aims to demonstrate, by having his characters eventually – and quite cathartically – reunited on an island which can be seen as the real-life correlative of the virtual ‘contact zones’ (Pratt, 1992) they more usually frequent on the web, Coupland explores the ways in which this sort of transnational and transcultural hyper-universe we inhabit can be both utopian and dystopian. Indeed, if globalization’s condition of ‘complex connectivity’ already implies a tension towards a unification (and a homogenisation) of the world (Tomlinson, 1999), the deterritorialising web that covers the planet could be seen as producing depersonalisation as well. The interconnected globe is a place where, as Coupland writes in his book on McLuhan, not only has “geography [...] become irrelevant” but “the voice inside your head has become a different voice. It used to be ‘you’. Now [it] is that of a perpetual nomad drifting along a melting landscape, living day to day, expecting everything and nothing” (Coupland, 2010: 9). A condition that the author arguably performs, and wants the viewer to experience, also through his 2014 Vancouver exhibition/installation “everywhere is anywhere is anything is everything”, where face- and home-less figures mingle with unlocatable places and where so called ‘Slogans for the 21st century’ cry out that “Your sense of community is now something you visit at 11.30 p.m. on a website”. \nThe irony is that you can visit the exhibition itself on a website, by simply crossing the virtual spaces of Google Cultural Institute, which is currently considered one of the most valuable promoters of art and culture as transnational property.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".