DS 87-9 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 9: Design Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to the proceedings of the 21 st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17).Each of the 413 manuscripts provides its own contribution to the vibrant community of design researchers and practitioners.Th e individual contributions come together to make a signifi cant collective impact on this year's conference theme: Resource-Sensitive Design.We are delighted to present an exciting scientifi c programme that acknowledges the rich tradition of the ICED conference series, manifests the collective creation of bodies of insights, connects across topics, and provides vantage points for the role and importance of designing emergent futures.We placed particular emphasis on the young by introducing a design competition in form of a High-School Student Design Fair, by opening the conference also to the wider public that aft ernoon, by fostering research talent in the PhD Forum, and by providing a platform for visions and dreams of and for the Design World to come through the Young Members' Event.Reviews have been invaluable for the ICED17 programme team in making their fi nal acceptance decisions, grouping papers into the conference topics, and connecting to the conference theme.As a result, resource-sensitive design, design processes, design organisation and management, design research applications and case studies, product, services and systems design, design methods and tools, design for X / design to X, design information and knowledge, design theory and research methodology, human behaviour in design, and design education are all well represented in podium and discussion sessions.Th e attentive observer will also pick up weak signals of upcoming trends through the papers and presentation sessions.We trust that the careful selection of session chairs will amplify these signals.Th e papers have been collated into a multiple range of formats: a programme and abstracts book, a memory stick of full proceedings, and nine volumes of proceedings, available for download from the Design Society website.Th ese have been numbered against both Design Society and ISSN/ISBN referencing.Th e ICED conference proceedings are included in the Th omson Reuters Conference Proceedings Citation Index.Th is will enable more extensive access and increase citations.We hope that you will enjoy the programme, and that you will participate actively in what is arguably the premier engineering design research conference in the world.We also hope that you will fi nd the time to enjoy Vancouver, catch up with old friends and make some new ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.225 | 0.077 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".