The East and the West: From holism to dialogue through confrontation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with the development of Western and Eastern civilisations and their movement away from unity through opposition in order to seek ways out of geopolitical crisis. It is known that of all the bipolarities defining the general trends of cultural development in the modern world, the one of greatest significance refers to the "East-West" divide. The multiplicity of cultural worlds that represents humanity tends to be recast into the metacultural "East-West" dichotomy. It is well known that this kind of bipolarity has been a source of destructive historical events (the Balkans in Europe, Hindustan Peninsula, the Maghreb countries, etc.). However, history also offers some examples which prove the existence of the possibility of dialogic confrontation resolution (e.g., the synthesis from which Moorish culture26 was formed when Spain was conquered by the Arabs or the Métis in the Americas). The article concludes that the spiritual "flight to the East" in European culture began in the early 1960s, and even now it is a very important indicator. Eastern aesthetics ifluenced the nature of Western art during the last decades of the 20th century. The impact of Western culture turned out to be highly significant for the philosophical and aesthetic postulates of Chan (Zen) Buddhism, as well as other religious and philosophical ideas of the East. In the 20th century, Europe - the successor of ancient spiritual values - gave its attention to the religious and philosophical systems of the East, trying to work out a new crisis-free attitude. The relations between the West and the East became isolated; and now we talk of the quantity and quality of their perception of each other, about how to find a new, global syncretism of Eastern and Western civilisations whilst retaining both their identities and their distinctiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.056 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.023 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.022 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".