MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981328054

Effects of Concrete Barriers on Wildlife Crossing in the West Kootenay Region, British Columbia

2020· report· en· W6981328054 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2020
Typereport
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildlifeFencingKilometerWork (physics)Road constructionWildlife managementWildlife conservation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I explored the effects that animal vehicle collisions have on vehicle operators as well as wildlife species through extensive literature based research. I also examined the relationship between roadways and wildlife, and specifically how roadways can isolate populations, fragment habitat, and fragment territories, as well as how structures along roadways impact animal crossing. I conducted a pilot study along the 42.6 kilometer stretch of Highway 3A from Castlegar to Nelson, British Columbia. The field work involved using ArcGIS’s Survey123 application to record roadkill data points over a four-month study period. The objective of this study were to determine the animal species most frequently stuck along this stretch of highway, identify roadkill hotspots, determine if there is an increase in the number of animals hit when there are concrete barriers present along the sides of this highway, and to determine an effective roadkill mitigation technique that could be implemented along Highway 3A. From the pilot study I determined there is no obvious relationship between the number of animals struck and concrete barriers being present along the side of the highway. From my study I found wild turkeys to be the most frequently hit species, followed by black bears and squirrels. I identified and mapped out two prominent roadkill hotspots along Highway 3A and determined through background research that the most effective roadkill mitigation technique would be an overpass at each roadkill hotspot with at least five kilometers of fencing on either side of the entrances to the overpasses. I concluded that the relationship between roadways and wildlife needs to be better understood and that similar future studies would be valuable to better understand these relationships. It would be valuable for the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to invest more money into implementing more roadkill mitigation techniques such as crossing structures combined with fencing to prevent future vehicle-animal collisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)Same topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207