EFFECT OF INTERCROPPING WITH FABA BEAN ON LAND EQUIVALENCY RATIO AND SOIL HEALTH IN SASKATCHEWAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intercropping has a host of benefits, including increased yields and greater yield stability; lower disease, pest, and weed pressure; complementary resource use; and lower inputs of commercial fertilizer and pesticides. What is not known is how increasing biodiversity within a field impacts the soil health, as preserving and building soil health is important for maintaining productivity within an agricultural system. While legumes are often included within an intercrop, faba bean (Vicia faba L.) has particular potential to be a successful intercropping partner due to its high nitrogen fixation rate, disease resistance, and high protein content in the seed. A 2-year field study in Saskatoon, SK examined intercropping with faba bean including the following combinations:(faba-oat (Avena sativa), faba-canola (Brassica napus), faba-flax (Linum usitatissimum), faba-wheat (Triticum aestivum) along with other popular intercropping systems in the Canadian prairies: pea (Pisum sativum) -canola, lentil (Lens culinaris) -wheat, chickpea (Cicer arietinum) -flax. The land equivalency ratio and yield of different intercrops and their effect on soil health indicators including total nitrogen, soil protein, organic carbon, and active protein, along with water soluble nitrogen, and available nitrogen and phosphorus supply rates were evaluated. Pea-canola, faba-flax, and chickpea-flax over yielded, with LER values of 1.25, 1.09, and 1.07, respectively, showing land use efficiency benefits. Urea fertilization, more than crop type, impacted water soluble nitrogen levels. Supplies of plant available N and P in the soil during the growing season were influenced by legume type and soil moisture conditions. While no effects on soil health indicators were observed early in the growing season, after flowering legumes showed a greater increase in soil protein and a greater active protein value at harvest than nonlegumes. Long-term soil health factors of total nitrogen and organic carbon were unaffected in a one-year period by different cropping strategies. Further research is needed on the microbial association with legume rhizodeposition and later season root and nodule senescence to determine the mechanisms that legumes possess that affect soil protein and active carbon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".