MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981355129

Effects of Cultural Matching and Identity Safety: An Examination of Indigenous Student’s School Experiences

2023· article· en· W6981355129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Mathematics Enthusiast · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousIdentity (music)Cultural safetyCultural identityMatching (statistics)Indigenous cultureQualitative research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cultural matching refers to the reflection of one’s own culture in day-to-day life, which is critical for nurturing one’s sense of acceptance and identity in the world (Rip et.al., 2020). Identity safety is when one’s social identity is welcomed and valued rather than viewed as a barrier to success The presence of cultural matching and identity safety is important in educational settings throughout childhood and adolescence, as both are crucial to students’ overall well-being and identity. Opportunities to express one’s culture in the classroom is essential for a sense of belonging and safety (Steele & Cohen-Vargas, 2013); however, Indigenous students do not often experience such opportunities. Using Indigenous Research Methodologies (e.g., Kovach, 2009), an Indigenous researcher interviewed Indigenous participants (N = 7) attending the University of Montana. Qualitative data analyses were conducted via audio-recorded, in-person interviews, which were then transcribed through Zoom. Participants were asked to share their experiences of cultural matching and identity safety regarding their school environments. Research team members then analyzed data to delineate common themes, which included both negative experiences due to a lack of cultural matching, as well as positive experiences when cultural matching was present. The results of the current study will highlight the effects of those experiences on Indigenous students and provide implications and applications for students at the University of Montana. Implications for this research will help us to identify barriers that Indigenous students are currently facing within their educational settings and will help us understand what components can effectively promote a culturally rich and safe environment for future Indigenous students. References Cohn-Vargas, Esther & Steele, Dorothy. (2013). Identity Safe Classrooms: Places to Belong and Learn. Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Rip, J., Zijlstra, E., Post, W., Kalverboer, M., & Knorth, E.J. (2020). Cultural matching factors, child factors and fostering factors associated with successful foster placement: An explorative study into the perspectives of unaccompanied refugee children, their foster carers and guardians. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105408. Windchief, S., & San Pedro, T. (2019). Applying indigenous research methods: Storying with peoples and communities New York, NY: Routledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Mathematics EnthusiastSame topicIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesFrench-language works237,207