Effets d’une thérapie intensive de groupe pour les adolescentes et adolescents franco-québécois qui bégaient : résultats d’une étude rétrospective = Impact of intensive group therapy for Québec-French-speaking adolescents who stutter: Findings of a retrospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abrégé \nLe bégaiement développemental est un trouble complexe qui affecte non seulement la parole, mais également les relations sociales et le développement identitaire chez plusieurs adolescentes et adolescents qui bégaient. Les thérapies de groupe semblent une modalité appréciée et efficace auprès de cette population. L’Association des jeunes bègues du Québec propose depuis 1993 une thérapie intensive de groupe, sous forme de camp de vacances, aux jeunes de 13 à 17 ans. Au total, les adolescentes et adolescents reçoivent environ 50 heures d’intervention orthophonique, lesquelles sont consacrées depuis 2011 à une application adaptée du programme Camperdown accompagnée d’activités d’éducation psychologique inspirées de la thérapie cognitivocomportementale. L’objectif de la présente étude est d’évaluer les effets de cette thérapie intensive de groupe sur le plan de la parole. Pour y parvenir, une étude clinique rétrospective a été effectuée. Les données sociodémographiques et cliniques ont été extraites d’un échantillon de 44 dossiers de jeunes de 13 à 17 ans ayant bénéficié de la thérapie de groupe de l’Association des jeunes bègues du Québec de 2011 à 2019. Des statistiques descriptives ont permis d’obtenir un portrait détaillé des participantes et participants. Des analyses statistiques non paramétriques ont démontré une diminution significative (p < 0,01) des valeurs de pourcentage de syllabes bégayées et de sévérité subjective du bégaiement au terme des six jours de thérapie intensive. De plus, la majorité des jeunes avaient amorcé la phase III du programme Camperdown — qui comporte quatre phases au total. D’autres recherches sont nécessaires afin d’étudier l’efficacité de l’intervention auprès des adolescentes et adolescents qui bégaient, notamment en regard des facteurs psychosociaux associés au bégaiement. \n \nAbstract \nDevelopmental stuttering is a complex disorder that affects not only speech, but also social interactions and identity formation in many adolescents who stutter. Group therapy appears to be a popular and effective treatment modality for working with this population. Since 1993, the Association des jeunes bègues du Québec [Québec Association of Young Stutterers] has been offering intensive group therapy during summer camps to young people aged 13 to 17 years. In total, the adolescents receive approximately 50 hours of speech-language pathology therapy, which has been devoted to an adapted form of the Camperdown Program with cognitive behaviour therapy inspired activities since 2011. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this intensive group therapy on adolescents’ speech abilities using a retrospective clinical study design. Sociodemographic and clinical data were drawn from the clinical files of 44 individuals aged 13 to 17 who took part in the group therapy offered by the Association des jeunes bègues du Québec between 2011 and 2019. Descriptive statistics provided a detailed profile of the participants. Nonparametric statistical analyses showed a significant decrease (p < .01) in the percentage of syllables stuttered and in the subjective severity of stuttering after 6 days of intensive therapy. In addition, most of the individuals had begun Stage III of the four-stage Camperdown Program. Further research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of this intervention with adolescents who stutter, particularly with regard to the psychosocial factors associated with stuttering. © 2023, Canadian Association of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".