MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981460356

Electron detachment and fragmentation of laser-excited rotationally hot Al<sub>4</sub><sup>−</sup>

2015· article· en· W6981460356 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMax Planck Digital Library · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFragmentation (computing)IonizationIonElectronElectron ionizationAdiabatic processElectron capturePhoton energy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Absolute photoabsorption cross sections of negatively charged tetra-atomic aluminum clusters have been measured for photon energies between 1.8 and 2.7 eV. The experiment used the depletion technique in combination with an electrostatic ion-beam trap, in which Al<sub>4</sub><sup>−</sup>ions produced in a sputter ion source were stored for 90 ms before being subjected to a short laser pulse. Moreover, the competition between one-atom fragmentation and electron emission of the laser-excited Al<sub>4</sub><sup>−</sup> has been measured. These measurements show that fragmentation dominates electron emission at all photon energies below the electron attachment energy of ∼2.2 eV, even though the fragmentation energy is expected to be 10%–20% higher than the electron attachment energy. These findings, when taken together with the delayed-electron and fragmentation yields observed in a previous measurement [O. Aviv et al., Phys. Rev. A 83, 023201 (2011)], can be well explained within the statistical phase-space theory for unimolecular decays assuming the Al4− ions to be rotationally hot. The analysis permits the determination of the adiabatic electron detachment energy of Al4− to be Ead=(2.18±0.02) eV and the one-atom fragmentation energy to be D0=(2.34±0.05) eV. Moreover, two direct s-wave ionization channels are observed with threshold energies of (2.18±0.02) eV and (2.45±0.02) eV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it