ERIC ED466540: Bosnia and Herzegovina. Civic Education Program for 1999-2000.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of a civic education program in Bosnia and Herzegovina was to continue to promote the development of democratic principles through an informed electorate and a responsive government. To achieve this, the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES) maintained the Zenica, Livno, and Doboj field offices and, in the final quarter of activity, opened new offices in Bijelinja and Bihac. From July 1999 to December 1999 program staff focused on civic action initiatives assisting local representatives in prioritizing needs, formulating requests, and presenting these requests to their elected officials. With the establishment of the new offices, activities shifted to a voter education concentration in preparation for the April 8, 2000 municipal elections. From these five offices, a staff of 30 national civic/voter education trainers implemented a program involving voter education seminars, civic education seminars, and promoting civic action initiatives. Over the life of the activity, project staff conducted seminars (n=7,542) which reached citizens (n=106,361) directly; distributed election-related literature (n=111,142) throughout municipalities (n=62); and established civic initiative groups (n=350) which achieved verified cases of action (n=100+) by local authorities. This report provides the following: (1) "Executive Summary"; (2) "Background"; (3) "Program Descriptions"; (4) "Project Implementation" (Mobilization and Methodology; and Results); (5) "Conclusions and Recommendations"; and (6) "Appendices". (BT)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.132 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".