An epidemiological survey of chlamydial & gonococcal infections in a Canadian Arctic community : determinants of sexually transmitted infections among remote Inuit populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Problem \nSexually transmitted infections (STIs) pose serious health problems for Canadian Inuit people. \nThis is compounded by ineffective screening and disease prevention strategies. Programs will \nhave little impact on reducing infection rates if they do not target accurate disease prevalence and \nkey determinants of transmission. \nMethods \nA cross-sectional survey (Part A) was conducted among Inuit males and females (ages 15-65 \nyears) in a Baffin community. Participants (n = 181; mean age = 29.6) were screened for \nchlamydia/gonorrhea and interviewed. The questionnaire, which followed the Theories of \nReasoned Action and Planned Behaviour, was used to collect information on demographics, use \nof health services, sexual histories, STI and contraceptive knowledge, high-risk behaviours, \nperceived risk and barriers of condom use. \nA random sample (n = 100) was selected from Part A for the longitudinal cohort. \nIndividuals were followed every two months post baseline for four follow-up visits. At each \nvisit, participants were screened for chlamydia/gonorrhea and questioned about their \nsexual/social networks and condom use. Networks were developed through "snowball"sampling. \nResults \nOverall, 35 cases of chlamydia were detected, with 21 detected at baseline and 14 during followup. \nThe combined cases gave an overall prevalence of 15.6% in comparison with 2.7% that was \npreviously estimated. No gonorrhea was detected. The strongest predictors for STIs included: \nfemale gender (OR 2.45, CI: 0.55, 10.89), recent STI (OR 9.82, CI: 2.70, 35.77) and a history of \ngreater than 2 previous STIs (OR 1. 47, 0.92, 2.30). Chlamydia prevalence decreased by at least \n22% post baseline screening and treatment intervention. \nMajor barriers to condom use included: embarrassed to purchase condoms, discussing \ncondom use, and fear of giving a bad impression. There were no significant differences between \nmales and females (p = 0.73) and between the age groups (p = 0.67) regarding condom use. Conclusion \nConsistent with the literature, the results support universal screening use in populations with \ngreater then 1 0% chlamydia prevalence. Screening should especially target individuals with prior \nhistory of chlamydia and/or gonorrhea. Universal screening, prompt treatment and \ncomprehensive contact tracing are strongly recommended for STI prevention in all Inuit \ncommunities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".