MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6981734096

Exploring the meaning of aging & physically active leisure in the lives of older Canadian men - Directions for health promotion strategies

2018· dissertation· en· W6981734096 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish Identity and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Thematic analysisPhysical activityHealth promotionMeaning (existential)Promotion (chess)Healthy aging
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major concern in the context of aging populations is improving patterns of physical activity involvement. However, there is insufficient knowledge pertaining to the relationship between successful aging and physical activity in the lives of older Canadian adults targeted in health promotion strategies. Preliminary evidence suggests that older Canadian women have varying beliefs about the ways they can age successfully and the perceived role that physical activity plays in this process. Thus, the objectives of this research project were to (1) develop a critical and in-depth understanding of successful aging and physical activity in the lives of older Canadian men and, (2) inform the development of health promotion initiatives and sport policy aimed at older adults. Semi­structured interviews were administered to 19 older Canadian men (75-90 years of age) who varied in their level of physical activity involvement (active, inactive, active with assistance). A thematic analysis was used to analyze the data through the use of standard coding and comparison procedures. Throughout the data collected, three overall themes emerged: meanings of aging, Physically Active Leisure – lived experiences, and directions for health promotion strategies. Overall, findings suggest that older Canadian men also have varying beliefs about the ways they can age successfully and the perceived role that physical activity plays in this process. For example, inactive participants (who are the logical targets of health promotion strategies) placed less importance on popularized biomedical elements of aging success and regular structured exercise than active participants. Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers should be aware of the varying perspectives older adults use to frame the intersection of successful aging and physical activity so that health programs and policy may be tailored accordingly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)→Same topicJewish Identity and Society→French-language works237,207→