MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981812760

Finite Element Analysis of Buckling Capacity of Conical Steel Tanks Considering Field-measured Initiation Imperfections – A Case Study

2021· article· en· W6981812760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAgricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConical surfaceFinite element methodBucklingStorage tankWavelength
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The geometric imperfection in elevated steel conical water tanks is a key factor that influences the buckling capacity of the tank. Current considerations of imperfections in the design of conical tanks are based on theoretical analysis, whereby the imperfection shapes and locations are assumed to have the most critical impact on the capacity. This thesis investigates the initial imperfections of an actual stiffened liquid-filled steel conical tank (LFCT) based on high-resolution laser scan measurement data of the tank geometry.\nIn the first part of this study, detailed analyses of the laser scan data were carried out to extract the global and local initial imperfections of the tank. The global imperfection represents the ovalization of the tank circumferences at difference elevations and shift of the tank central axis from the nominal central axis position. The local imperfection is the difference between the overall and global imperfections. As part of the evaluation of the tank’s structural integrity the imperfections extracted from the laser scan data are compared with specified tolerances recorded in design standards (AWWA D100-11; EN 1993-1-6: 2007, etc.) and with theoretical expressions available in the literature. Analysis results have shown that local & total imperfections exceed the tolerances specified in the design standards at several locations on the tank and the discrepancy between the imperfection wavelengths specified in the standards and observed from the data.\nIn the second part of this study, three-dimensional finite element models of the stiffened conical steel water tank were established. Initial imperfections of various shapes have been incorporated into the models, including patterns extracted from the laser scan data and assumptions from previous studies. Their impacts on the buckling capacity were analyzed by a series of elastoplastic analyses and compared with each other. Conservativeness of assumed imperfection shapes have been verified with more impact than components of field measured imperfections of higher amplitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it