Fortificacions projectades a Tortosa en el segle XIX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tortosa ha estat una plaça forta fins a mitjans del segle XX, amb tot el que ha implicat\nde processos de millora en les fortificacions existents a mida que feia falta.\nAixí va ser durant l’edat mitjana i edat moderna.\nPosteriorment, també es van plantejar diverses millores, puntuals o de gran abast,\ni , en algun cas, vinculades amb algun eixample projectat durant el segon terç del\nsegle XIX. Un exemple és el datat l’any 1852 per a fer-se més enllà del Cap de Pont,\nobra mai realitzat, amb una superfície de nova ocupació dos vegades més gran que\nla ciutat preexistent.\n\n[ANGLÈS]\nTortosa was an important military stronghold until the middle XXth century. As a result, during the Middle and Modern ages its fortifications have been constantly refurbished, improved and adpated to the needs of warfare. After the modern period several low-level and also general improvements were designed, sometimes linked to the city expansion projects of the last XIXth century. One of these projects, never accomplished, was planned in 1852. It had to expand the city beyond the “Cappont”, that is, the fortress that protected the boat-bridge. This projected new quarter was to double the area of the existing city.\n\n[CASTELLÀ]\nTortosa ha sido una plaza fuerte hasta mediados del siglo XX, hecho que ha significado continuos procesos de mejora en las fortificaciones existentes a medida que se precisaban. Así fue durante la edad media y la edad moderna. Con posterioridad también se plantearon diversas mejoras, puntuales o de gran abasto, y, en algún caso, vinculadas a algún ensanche, proyectado durante el segundo tercio del siglo XIX. Un ejemplo es el datado en el año 1852 que se quería hacer más allá del Cap de Pont, una obra nunca realizada, con una superficie de nueva ocupación dos veces mayor que la ciudad preexistente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".