Géolocalisation des pairs à l’adolescence et enjeux relationnels : les usages sociaux de la SnapMap
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis quelques annes, la frquentation juvnile des espaces communicationnels en ligne s'accompagne de vrifications de prsence toujours plus diversifies et intrusives, telles que l'heure de la dernire connexion, l'ouverture ou non d'un contenu ou le fait d'tre en train de rdiger une rponse.La SnapMap, issue de l'application Snapchat, s'impose aujourd'hui comme une illustration significative de cette logique de surveillance, en permettant aux jeunes d'afficher en temps rel leur position gographique.Cette contribution empirique, qui s'appuie sur une mthodologie qualitative (27 entretiens semi-directifs), rend compte des appropriations, dtournements et enjeux de ce dispositif sociotechnique particulirement bavard sur la prsence et l'activit, en ligne comme hors ligne, des pairs adolescents.Il ressort que si elle peut tre utilise par simple curiosit ou servir des stratgies de regroupement ou d'vitement, la SnapMap reste surtout un rvlateur de vrit dans le cas de fortes amitis ou de relations sentimentales.Elle apparat aussi comme un espace rsolument codifi : la dconnexion volontaire l'outil entrane la ncessit d'une justification et le manque de matrise dans le partage de sa localisation y est socialement sanctionn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".