MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982081402

G protein specificity of dopamine D2S receptor signaling in cell growth and proliferation

2000· dissertation· en· W6982081402 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2000
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsHeterotrimeric G proteinG proteinG protein-coupled receptor kinaseG protein-coupled receptorReceptor5-HT5A receptorSignal transductionEnzyme-linked receptorDopamine receptor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wide range of hormonal, developmental and growth factors regulate cellular growth and proliferation events through receptors that couple to heterotrimeric G proteins. Upon activation of the receptor by its ligand the G protein is activated and subsequent dissociation of alpha subunit from betagamma dimer initiates a cascade of intracellular signaling events. Dopamine D2 receptors, short form (D2S) and long form (D2L) have been implicated in diverse physiological functions including the regulation of pituitary cell proliferation. Although in neuro-endocrine cells, the D2 receptor is traditionally known as an inhibitory receptor since it couples to "inhibitory" G proteins (Gi/Go), a stimulatory role of this receptor has been reported in many non-neuronal cell systems involving growth-related signaling pathways. In this thesis, I have investigated the role of the dopamine D2S receptor in cell growth under the hypothesis that "D2S receptor couples specifically to multiple combinations of Gi/o protein subtypes to initiate specific signaling pathways contributing to cellular proliferation".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesFrench-language works237,207