Harbor dues and transit charges at Montreal and Atlantic ports.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Towage Question 1.The following concise statement shows the eastward and westward traffic earnings of the New York Central and the Erie railways, and the Canals respectively for a period of twenty-four years,-the rates per ton per mile being also given.It appears that, though the rate by canal is 33 to 50 per cent.iess than by the railways, the water route has not been able to hold its own.Ykars.N. Y. Central Eailway.Erie Railway.New York Canals.Average rate Amount of Average rate Amount of Average rate per ton per Freight earned.per ton per Freight and per ton per mile.mile.Tolls.mile.1856 $ 4,328,041 2.97 cents.$ 4,545,782 2.48 cents.$ 6,573,225 1.11 cents, 1857 4,559,276 3.13 « 4,097,610 2.45 « 3,876,000 7.99 mills.1858 3,700,270 2.59 « 3,843,310 3 32 " 4,502,437 7.97 " 1859 3,337,148 2.13 " 3,195,869 2.17 « 3,665,806 6.72 " 1860 4,095,934 2.06 « 3,884,343 1.84 " 8,049,450 9.94 " 1861 4,644,449 1.96 « 4,351,464 1.73 " 9,369.3781.08 cents.1862 6,607,331 2.22 " 6,642,915 1.89 « 10,780,431 9.59 mills.1863 7,498,509 2.40 « 8,432,234 2.09 » 9,065,005 8 76 " 1864 8,543,370 2.75 « 9,855,087 2 31 " 10,039,609 1.15 cents.1865 8,776,028 3.31 « 10,726,264 2 76 » 8,605,961 1.10 " 1866 9,671,920 2.92 " 11,611,023 2.45 " 10,160,051 1.00 « 1867 9,151,750 2.53 « 11,204,689 2 04 " 8,663,119 0.90 « 1868 9,491,427 2.59 « 11,425,739 1.92 " 9,012,659 0.88 " 1869 10,457,582 2.20 « 13,046,804 1.60 « 8,492,131 92 « 1870 14,327,418 1.86 " 12,328,027 1.37 " 7,552,988 83 " 1871 14,647,580 1.65 « 13,232,235 1.47 « 10,779,887 1.02 « 1872 16,259.6471.69 " 14,509,745 1.52 « 10,648,711 1.02 " 1873 19,616,018 1.57 " 15,015,808 1.45 " 9,267,503 0.88 « 1874 20,348,735 1.47 » 13,740,042 1.31 " 6,972,607 0.73 « 1875 17,899,702 1.27 " 12,287,400 1.21 " 4,863,137 0.66 «
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.116 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".