Have you heard that...? Developmental trajectories and psychological variables associated with relational aggression and gossip
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional definitions of aggressive behaviours have emphasized acts of physical and verbal aggression.By labelling behaviours such as gossip, manipulation or social isolation as aggressive acts, the traditional definition of aggression has been challenged and expanded.Consequently, relational aggression has emerged as a prolific field of study.In this context, "Many years later, in front of the firing squad, colonel Aureliano Buenda would remember that distant afternoon his father took him to see ice." Gabriel Garcia Marquez, One Hundred Years of SolitudeNow that this journey is approaching to an end, it is inevitable to remember the day when all this began.As Colonel Buendia remembered when he almost faced the end of his life, I can vividly recall all the excitement, fear, anxiety, joy and hope that I felt the first time I was at McGill.Also, I keep in my memory appreciation for all the persons who accompanied me during this long path.First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Victoria Talwar.She believed in me from the very first time we met and always encouraged me to do my best and to excel in all my responsibilities.I found in Victoria a model to follow: I learned not only from your academic and research strengths, but also from your kindness, generosity and humanity.Thank you!I really appreciate our relationship and look forward to many years of continued collaboration.Doomsday-list is a word that will keep haunting me the rest of my life!Also, I want to extend my gratitude to Nancy Heath and Shaheen Shariff, who provided feedback and insights to help
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".