MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6982136600

Health, health care, and economic experiences of immigrants in Canada: an interdisciplinary analysis

2023· dissertation· en· W6982136600 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesPublic Health AgencyGovernment of OntarioMental Health CommissionGovernment of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsImmigrationMental healthOddsHealth carePopulationShock (circulatory)Neighbourhood (mathematics)Social determinants of health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding immigrants’ use and preferences for health care services is essential to be able to shape a health care system that is equitable. Without doing so, we risk population health deterioration that can be both costly for immigrants and society. Given the bidirectional relationship between income and health, it also becomes important to understand how immigrants respond economically to health shocks. With this understanding, the objectives of this thesis are as follows: 1) investigate whether neighbourhood immigrant concentration influences the relationship between immigrant status and mental health problems and mental health service use among youth and children in Ontario, 2) assess the impacts of a cerebrovascular or cardiovascular health shock on income variables (i.e., employment income, governmental income, total income, and household income) in heterogenous immigrant populations in Canada, and 3) explore preferences for home care and long-term care among older adults in Ontario. Novel findings from each of the studies include: 1) immigrants show lower odds of having elevated mental health problems and using mental health services compared to non-immigrants. The probability of using mental health services among immigrants is lower in immigrant-concentrated neighbourhoods, 2) a cardiovascular or cerebrovascular health shock does not cause a significant reduction in employment income. Also, the impact of a cardiovascular or cerebrovascular health shock on income variables is not significantly different than the impact of other types of health shocks, and 3) individuals are willing to pay approximately $4000 extra per month for home care compared to long-term care. Other attributes preferred include having a private room, living at a short distance to family/friends, and having culturally adapted care. This program of research advances intersectoral research on immigrant health and health care use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→