Hubungan antara self efficacy dengan quarter life crisis pada manusia Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara self efficacy dengan quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan angkatan 2019 dengan sampel penelitian 158 mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif dengan alat ukur skala yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu skala self efficacy dan skala quarter life crisis. Analisis data penelitian ini menggunakan teknik analisis product moment dengan bantuan program Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) 16.0 for windows. Hasil penelitian diperoleh koefisien korelasi sebesar - 0,922 dan taraf signifikansi p=0,000 (p<0,01) menunjukkan bahwa adanya hubungan negatif yang sangat signifikan antara self efficacy dengan quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi angkatan 2019. Sumbangan efektif variabel self efficacy terhadap variabel quarter life crisis pada penelitian ini sebesar 85,0 %. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa semakin tinggi self efficacy maka semakin rendah quarter life crisis. Sebaliknya, semakin rendah self efficacy maka semakin tinggi quarter life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".