HUBUNGAN SELF-EFFICACY DENGAN QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA MAHASISWA TINGKAT AKHIR PSIKOLOGI ISLAM UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SAYYID ALI RAHMATULLAH TULUNGAGUNG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seorang individu yang berada pada kondisi quarter life crisis akan mengalami banyak masalah akibat adanya tekanan, dan munculnya kecemasan serta kebingungan akan masa depan. Self-efficacy adalah keyakinan individu untuk mencapai serta menyelesaika tugasnya dalam rangka mewujudkan suatu tujuan yang diharapkan, sehingga self-efficacy berperan dalam mengatasi kondisi quarter life crisis. Penelitian bertujuan mengetahui hubungan antara self-efficacy dengan quarter life crisis. Pendekatan kuantitatif korelasi digunakan pada penelitian ini. Sebanyak 144 mahasiwa yang sedang menempuh tugas akhir dengan rentang umur 20-30 tahun dijadikan sebagai subjek penelitian yang diambil dengan teknik probability sampling. Uji korelasi Product Moment Pearson memanfaatkan IBM SPSS versi 25 digunakan dalam analisis data penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa semester akhir Psikologi Islam Universitas Islam Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung memiliki hubungan yang negatif dan signifikan antara Self-efficacy dengan Quarter Life Crisis. \nKata kunci: dewasa awal, self-efficacy, quarter life crisis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".