MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6982363030

Impact of Environmental Variability on Net Ecosystem CO2 Exchange from 2008-2018 at a High Arctic Mesic Tundra Site

2020· dissertation· en· W6982363030 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTundraGrowing seasonEcosystemEcosystem respirationArcticPrimary productionEddy covarianceTerrestrial ecosystem
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arctic terrestrial carbon (C) budgets are shifting with respect to net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE), and its component fluxes; i.e., gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco) under amplified high latitude climate change. Determining whether Arctic ecosystems are behaving as net sinks or net sources is important as these scenarios are associated with various feedback mechanisms, either mitigating or enhancing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Given the vast C stores in Arctic soils and permafrost, these processes can have significant impacts on atmospheric CO2 concentrations. This research investigates how growing season NEE has varied from 2008 to 2018 at the Cape Bounty Arctic Watershed Observatory (CBAWO) (74.92˚N, 109.58˚W) on Melville Island, Nunavut, Canada. The eddy covariance technique and standardized processing tools were used to observe inter-annual variability of NEE, GPP, and Reco and the relative importance of environmental variables in explaining variability of growing season CO2 fluxes. Overall, this site showed strong inter-annual variability in growing season NEE (range of -46.01 g C m-2 to 11.25 g C m-2) with GPP the most likely source of this variability, i.e., GPP rates were more variable compared to Reco. Inter-annual variability of growing season NEE appeared to be strongly driven by growing degree days (GDD) in warmer years, suggesting that temperature must reach a threshold in order to drive photosynthesis sufficiently to offset respiration. This deviated slightly in 2014, the second strongest CO2 sink across observed years (-21.24 g C m-2), but with reduced cumulative GDD. This is believed to be a result of delayed ecosystem response to previous environmental conditions favorable for strong CO2 uptake. CO2 fluxes also showed varying importance in the context of environmental variables at different temporal aggregations, with the remote sensing vegetation index showing strong importance for Reco, compared to GPP and NEE, suggesting a significant contribution of autotrophic respiration to Reco at this mesic site. This research reveals unique characteristics between inter-annual growing season CO2 flux patterns for a mesic tundra landscape and environmental drivers that overall, contribute to our understanding of High Arctic tundra CO2 dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→