MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982409557

Increasing Fusarium Head Blight Resistance Breeding Resources in Bread Wheat

2023· dissertation· en· W6982409557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusariumSowingPopulationFungicideResistance (ecology)Plant breedingPlant disease resistancePEST analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by Fusarium spp., is a destructive disease of cereal crops globally. It causes decreased yield, loss of quality, and potential mycotoxin contamination of harvested grain. Integrated pest management (IPM) strategies are required to mitigate the effects of FHB; using cultural control methods, appropriate fungicide application, and planting varieties with moderate or higher resistance ratings are used in combination. Planting a variety with elevated resistance is a vital component to IPM; however, there are limited resistant varieties available to producers. Breeding for FHB resistance is complicated, and sources of resistance are few. A continual search is ongoing for novel sources of resistance and other resources to aid in breeding efforts. The objective of this thesis is to aid in this search for novel sources of resistance and additional resources. Within this thesis, 11 minor and one major quantitative trait loci were identified in a RIL population with Agropyron repens L. ancestry; a wild relative to wheat identified as a possible source of FHB resistance. A detached leaf assay was also investigated in the hopes of saving time and resources in FHB resistance breeding. One moderately, inverse correlation was identified between incubation time and deoxynivalenol content in barley. Additionally, a phenotypic evaluation and preliminary Genome Wide Association Study was performed on Plant Gene Resources of Canada accessions. Four accessions were identified to have elevated FHB resistance based on best linear unbiased predictors. Thirteen SNPs were also associated with resistance within the population. The results of this thesis will aid wheat breeders in their efforts to breed for FHB resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207