MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982558190

Intrinsic kinetics of clathrate hydrate formation

2009· dissertation· en· W6982558190 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsClathrate hydrateMethaneHydrateMole fractionCarbon dioxideDissolutionSolubilityReaction rate constantPropane
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present thesis focuses on the intrinsic kinetics of clathrate hydrate formation to provide the fundamental data and modeling needed to predict hydrate growth. A novel hydrate growth model based on particle size distribution measurements and a concentration driving force was proposed. The reaction rate constant of propane hydrate formation was determined using the aforementioned model. The mole fraction of carbon dioxide and methane in the bulk liquid phase was measured at the onset of hydrate growth and thereafter in a semi-batch stirred tank crystallizer. It was found that the guest mole fraction in the bulk liquid phase increases with pressure, decreases with temperature and remains constant during at least the first thirteen minutes of the growth stage. Based on such measurements, an alternate formulation of the hydrate growth model, independent of the dissolution rate at the vapor-liquid water interface, was suggested. As a result, the reaction rate constant of both carbon dioxide and methane clathrate formation was determined and found to follow an Arrhenius-type relationship, increasing with temperature over a four-degree interval, while being insensitive to pressure over the range investigated. The temperature trend of the reaction rate constant of hydrate formation yielded positive activation energies for both carbon dioxide and methane hydrate growth. The carbon dioxide and methane solubility dependency on temperature in water under hydrate-liquid water and vapor-liquid water equilibrium was also demonstrated using fundamental thermodynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207