MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982585839

On the integrals of the Kudla-Millson theta series

2016· dissertation· W6982585839 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2016
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsEisenstein seriesGeodesicTheta functionAbelian groupSiegel modular formModular groupModular formSymmetric spaceSeries (stratigraphy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kudla-Millson theta series &thetas;km of a pseudoeuclidean space V of signature (p, q) and lattice L is a differential form on the symmetric space D attached to the pseudoorthogonal group O(p, q) that transforms like a genus n Siegel modular form of weight (p + q)/2. Any integral of &thetas;km inherits the modular transformation law and becomes a nonholomorphic Siegel modular form. A special case of such integral is the well-known Zagier Eisenstein series F(τ) of weight 3/2 as showed by Funke. We show that for n = 1 and p = 1 the integral of &thetas;km along a geodesic path coincides with the Zwegers theta function Θa,b. We construct a higher-dimensional generalization of Zwegers theta functions as integrals of &thetas;km over geodesic simplices for n ≥ 2. If Γ is a discrete group of isometries of V that preserve the lattice L and act trivially on the cosets L*/L, then the fundamental region Γ\D is an arithmetic locally symmetric space. We prove that the integral of &thetas; km over Γ\D converges and compute it in some cases. In particular, we extend the results of Kudla to the cases p = 1, and q odd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207